File Details |
|
File Size | 2.0 MB |
---|---|
License | Shareware |
Operating System | Windows 2000/9x/Server 2003/XP |
Date Added | November 13, 2006 |
Total Downloads | 1,150 |
Publisher | Anix Software |
Homepage | PicViewer |
Publisher's Description
PicViewer is an image viewer for most common file formats. PicViewer displays images in the following formats: BMP, ICO, CUR, ANI, WMF, EMF, GIF, JPEG, PNG, PCX, TIFF, PSD, FlashPix(FPX), PCD, icons from EXE, DLL, ICL files. Features: clean and easy-to-use interface, thumbnail mode, printing with print preview, slide show, browse by image file, image file name as command-line parameter, supports animated GIFs, Windows ANI files and multipage TIFF images, bookmarks, file operations, build-in image converter, fullscreen mode, file filters, Wallpaper operations, contains powerful GIF inspector, and more.
Latest Reviews
bobad reviewed v2.73 on May 21, 2001
Not too bad actually. A little bloated, and a little awkward to use. The popup nags are too bad to get a good feel for this program. In order to actually sell any copies of this software, it must soundly beat the freeware viewers IrfanView and Slow View, which it doesn't. If you wish to pay for a viewer, get ACDSee or Image Eye. They are much more intuitive and quick. -=Windows ME and 2000 already come with a very nice Explorer including thumbnails. Why do picture viewer authors think they must to re-invent the Windows Explorer? It only causes bloat and makes their viewers harder to use.=- (bobad@mindspring.com)
bobad reviewed v2.73 on May 21, 2001
Not too bad actually. A little bloated, and a little awkward to use. The popup nags are too bad to get a good feel for this program. In order to actually sell any copies of this software, it must soundly beat the freeware viewers IrfanView and Slow View, which it doesn't. If you wish to pay for a viewer, get ACDSee or Image Eye. They are much more intuitive and quick. -=Windows ME and 2000 already come with a very nice Explorer including thumbnails. Why do picture viewer authors think they must to re-invent the Windows Explorer? It only causes bloat and makes their viewers harder to use.=- (bobad@mindspring.com)