File Details |
|
| File Size | 0.3 MB |
|---|---|
| License | Freeware |
| Operating System | Windows 2000/9x/Server 2003/XP |
| Date Added | September 16, 2005 |
| Total Downloads | 2,848 |
| Publisher | RightMark Gathering |
| Homepage | Rightmark RAMTester |
Publisher's Description
RAMTester tool checks reliability of memory modules under MS Windows (x86 and x64), working with virtual addresses. It writes various bit patterns into memory cells and then reads them and compares with reference. Note that the check is qualitative, so you might want to use utilities working with real addresses under DOS to obtain more quantitative data.
Latest Reviews
The MAZZTer reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 6, 2005
The more I think about this, the more useless this program becomes.
This program can only test unused memory. At any one time I have over half my memory used. That's when I'm not doing much of anything.
So if I have bad memory, there's a 50% chance this program won't find it. So I'd have to boot from a floppy and use a DOS tool anyway.
So why bother with this in the first place?
husky87 reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 6, 2005
did any of you even bother to read the description? tools.
photonboy reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 5, 2005
This is really a waste of time.
Someone with problems may even run this program and conclude that they don't have RAM problems because it only tests the free RAM.
Banquo reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 5, 2005
"And sometimes it's better to test under the load of the windows GUI!" It's a nice program, but that's not how memory testers work. They load the memory themselves and test it; they don't test memory that is already being used. That's why it's better to run from a DOS startup disk so the memory is free.
pyridox reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 5, 2005
>RAM tests are best run in DOS
And sometimes it's better to test under the load of the windows GUI! Wjere most of apps run.
CyberDoc999 reviewed v1.0 Beta on Jul 14, 2005
Have you tried it?
This is a very good tester
5 stars*****
Draje reviewed v1.0 Beta on Jul 13, 2005
First off, as said before, there is an installer/uninstaller and RAM tests are best run in DOS.
The MAZZTer reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 6, 2005
The more I think about this, the more useless this program becomes.
This program can only test unused memory. At any one time I have over half my memory used. That's when I'm not doing much of anything.
So if I have bad memory, there's a 50% chance this program won't find it. So I'd have to boot from a floppy and use a DOS tool anyway.
So why bother with this in the first place?
husky87 reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 6, 2005
did any of you even bother to read the description? tools.
photonboy reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 5, 2005
This is really a waste of time.
Someone with problems may even run this program and conclude that they don't have RAM problems because it only tests the free RAM.
Banquo reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 5, 2005
"And sometimes it's better to test under the load of the windows GUI!" It's a nice program, but that's not how memory testers work. They load the memory themselves and test it; they don't test memory that is already being used. That's why it's better to run from a DOS startup disk so the memory is free.
pyridox reviewed v1.0 Beta 3 on Aug 5, 2005
>RAM tests are best run in DOS
And sometimes it's better to test under the load of the windows GUI! Wjere most of apps run.
CyberDoc999 reviewed v1.0 Beta on Jul 14, 2005
Have you tried it?
This is a very good tester
5 stars*****
Draje reviewed v1.0 Beta on Jul 13, 2005
First off, as said before, there is an installer/uninstaller and RAM tests are best run in DOS.