File Details |
|
| File Size | 0.7 MB |
|---|---|
| License | Freeware |
| Operating System | Windows 2000/9x/Server 2003/XP |
| Date Added | February 21, 2005 |
| Total Downloads | 375 |
| Publisher | Azonic Software Consulting, Inc. |
| Homepage | SpamSewer |
Publisher's Description
SpamSewer is the final answer to the SPAM problem because no other SPAM filtering system in the world works the same way. All filtering techniques used in the past and even today have major shortcomings (Bayesian, Challenge/Response, White Lists, Black Lists, Realtime Blackhole Lists (a.k.a. RBL), MX Record verification, Community Voting, Spam Signatures, etc.)
Latest Reviews
rpiotrowski reviewed v1.0 on Feb 7, 2004
TigerTou,
Sorry, but the website is a little dated. Let me clarify. A company would normally install a SpamSewer server in their datacenter between the firewall and their mail server. We decided that we don't want to be responsible for mail routing. Since this is really a server-side solution, we had to create a desktop client that interacted with a server to allow people to try this technology before installing it in their own datacenters. That's why we have a freeware desktop client. We'll be posting updates periodically on our site soon at www.spamsewer.com based on the feedback that we're receiving from our largest client, Fellowes.com.
If you're wondering why we're giving ourselves a 4 instead of a 5, it's because we know that we still have some work to do, but it's pretty darn good so far.
Thanks for trying it!
TigerTou reviewed v1.0 on Feb 5, 2004
Is anybody worried about rerouting their email thru one central collection point? What is the abuse potential for a system that, and I quote from the website: "You can add one or more (depending on volume) of our SpamSewer servers as an MX record for your domain's DNS settings. Your incoming mail from the internet will pass through our servers to be processed before reaching your own email server." I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but seems to me there would be a lot of proprietary, confidential, potentially libelous stuff in them thar emails that some budding entrepreneur would just love to package for sale.
rpiotrowski reviewed v1.0 on Feb 7, 2004
TigerTou,
Sorry, but the website is a little dated. Let me clarify. A company would normally install a SpamSewer server in their datacenter between the firewall and their mail server. We decided that we don't want to be responsible for mail routing. Since this is really a server-side solution, we had to create a desktop client that interacted with a server to allow people to try this technology before installing it in their own datacenters. That's why we have a freeware desktop client. We'll be posting updates periodically on our site soon at www.spamsewer.com based on the feedback that we're receiving from our largest client, Fellowes.com.
If you're wondering why we're giving ourselves a 4 instead of a 5, it's because we know that we still have some work to do, but it's pretty darn good so far.
Thanks for trying it!
TigerTou reviewed v1.0 on Feb 5, 2004
Is anybody worried about rerouting their email thru one central collection point? What is the abuse potential for a system that, and I quote from the website: "You can add one or more (depending on volume) of our SpamSewer servers as an MX record for your domain's DNS settings. Your incoming mail from the internet will pass through our servers to be processed before reaching your own email server." I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but seems to me there would be a lot of proprietary, confidential, potentially libelous stuff in them thar emails that some budding entrepreneur would just love to package for sale.