File Management Compression UPX (Ultimate Packer for eXecutables) for Windows

UPX (Ultimate Packer for eXecutables) for Windows 3.04 for Windows

by Markus & László

Avg. Rating 4.7 (120 votes)

File Details

File Size 0.3 MB
License Open Source
Operating System Windows 2000/9x/Server 2003/XP
Date Added
Total Downloads 17,036
Publisher Markus & László
Homepage UPX (Ultimate Packer for eXecutables)
Other Versions

Publisher's Description

UPX is a free, portable, extendable, high-performance executable packer for several different executable formats. It achieves an excellent compression ratio and offers very fast decompression. Your executables suffer no memory overhead or other drawbacks because of in-place decompression.

Latest Reviews

KAK

KAK reviewed v3.04 on Jan 27, 2011

i use UPX! since 2001 and after 10 years i have found
no other packer with this PERFECT compressing results.

Big Thanks to the Developer for this nice peace of work!

Joseph A

Joseph A reviewed v3.03 on Jul 29, 2008

To "therube" below:

You are right on this. That is why I suggested that they include it in FileForum yesterday night.

You can contribute too: whenever you find that there is a program or a new version of an existing program which was not posted in FileForum, suggest it to the Forum. They usually act fast on your suggestion.

To do this, click on "List a Program" at the top of the page, whose address is
http://fileforum.betanews.com/addprogram

therube

therube reviewed v3.03 on Jul 29, 2008

Just to point out, though this is is just (7-29-08) appearing in betanews, the 3.03 version has been out for 3 months now.

anomoly

anomoly reviewed v3.01 on Aug 1, 2007

My portable Alpx folder has these files:
COMDLG32.OCX
LZOP100 & 101.EXE
upx.1, .doc, & .html
UPX291.EXE (upx.exe)
Must have for portable standalone aps.

brusco

brusco reviewed v3.01 on Aug 1, 2007

best exe packer out there. been using it since 1.02 and has successfully compressed exe,ocx,dlls for me about 99% of the time.

I love it.

guti

guti reviewed v3.0 on May 1, 2007

Yeah, the old good boy, is still the best!

Kal-El

Kal-El reviewed v2.92 Beta on Mar 6, 2007

LZMA FTW! faster and better compression than --best

anomoly

anomoly reviewed v2.92 Beta on Jan 25, 2007

By replacing the exe in alpx (UPX291.EXE) and renaming it exactly I see no problem with alpx's gui either.
http://fileforum.betanew...etail/Alpx/1110410043/1

reets

reets reviewed v2.92 Beta on Jan 24, 2007

Absolutely the best. Used a LOT of other exe packers and this one is far above any other. Just waiting for .NET support then I am all set. (hopefully they add support for it)

[deXter]

[deXter] reviewed v2.91 Beta on Nov 30, 2006

Well, about time that someone submitted the 2.9x beta series to FileForum :)

The biggest change in the 2.9x series is the implementation of the LZMA algorithm. What this means is that your files have a MUCH better compression (even better than the --best option).

For testing purposes, I compressed the AutoHotkey compiler executable (AutoHotkeySC.bin) with the --best and --lzma options:

Original Size: 391 KB
--best option: 205 KB
--lzma option: 193 KB

Another important point to note is that the --lzma option is much more faster and efficient than the --best option. Check out the ratios for Firefox 2 executable:

Original size: 7,604,331
--best option: 3,246,592
--lzma option: 2,867,200

Truly, this is quite a significant improvement and brings UPX at par with other compressors that have already implemented lzma. But what seperates UPX from the competitors is the fact that UPX is rock solid and the exes are always working. I haven't come across a single exe that stopped working because of UPX. On the other hand, I've seen plenty of corrupted exes from the competitors.

UPX also supports a wide range of executables including *nix binaries, device drivers, 16 bit executables.. and.. even atari and PSone exes!

It's this stability and portability that makes UPX the prefered choice.

Avg. Rating 4.7 (120 votes)
Your Rating

Someone reviewed v on Mar 19, 2023

Pros:

Cons:

Bottom Line:

Someone reviewed v on Jul 5, 2022

Pros: 555

Cons: 555

Bottom Line: 555

KAK

KAK reviewed v3.04 on Jan 27, 2011

i use UPX! since 2001 and after 10 years i have found
no other packer with this PERFECT compressing results.

Big Thanks to the Developer for this nice peace of work!

Joseph A

Joseph A reviewed v3.03 on Jul 29, 2008

To "therube" below:

You are right on this. That is why I suggested that they include it in FileForum yesterday night.

You can contribute too: whenever you find that there is a program or a new version of an existing program which was not posted in FileForum, suggest it to the Forum. They usually act fast on your suggestion.

To do this, click on "List a Program" at the top of the page, whose address is
http://fileforum.betanews.com/addprogram

therube

therube reviewed v3.03 on Jul 29, 2008

Just to point out, though this is is just (7-29-08) appearing in betanews, the 3.03 version has been out for 3 months now.

anomoly

anomoly reviewed v3.01 on Aug 1, 2007

My portable Alpx folder has these files:
COMDLG32.OCX
LZOP100 & 101.EXE
upx.1, .doc, & .html
UPX291.EXE (upx.exe)
Must have for portable standalone aps.

brusco

brusco reviewed v3.01 on Aug 1, 2007

best exe packer out there. been using it since 1.02 and has successfully compressed exe,ocx,dlls for me about 99% of the time.

I love it.

guti

guti reviewed v3.0 on May 1, 2007

Yeah, the old good boy, is still the best!

Kal-El

Kal-El reviewed v2.92 Beta on Mar 6, 2007

LZMA FTW! faster and better compression than --best

anomoly

anomoly reviewed v2.92 Beta on Jan 25, 2007

By replacing the exe in alpx (UPX291.EXE) and renaming it exactly I see no problem with alpx's gui either.
http://fileforum.betanew...etail/Alpx/1110410043/1

reets

reets reviewed v2.92 Beta on Jan 24, 2007

Absolutely the best. Used a LOT of other exe packers and this one is far above any other. Just waiting for .NET support then I am all set. (hopefully they add support for it)

[deXter]

[deXter] reviewed v2.91 Beta on Nov 30, 2006

Well, about time that someone submitted the 2.9x beta series to FileForum :)

The biggest change in the 2.9x series is the implementation of the LZMA algorithm. What this means is that your files have a MUCH better compression (even better than the --best option).

For testing purposes, I compressed the AutoHotkey compiler executable (AutoHotkeySC.bin) with the --best and --lzma options:

Original Size: 391 KB
--best option: 205 KB
--lzma option: 193 KB

Another important point to note is that the --lzma option is much more faster and efficient than the --best option. Check out the ratios for Firefox 2 executable:

Original size: 7,604,331
--best option: 3,246,592
--lzma option: 2,867,200

Truly, this is quite a significant improvement and brings UPX at par with other compressors that have already implemented lzma. But what seperates UPX from the competitors is the fact that UPX is rock solid and the exes are always working. I haven't come across a single exe that stopped working because of UPX. On the other hand, I've seen plenty of corrupted exes from the competitors.

UPX also supports a wide range of executables including *nix binaries, device drivers, 16 bit executables.. and.. even atari and PSone exes!

It's this stability and portability that makes UPX the prefered choice.

[deXter]

[deXter] reviewed v2.03 on Nov 28, 2006

You guys should try out the new UPX 2.90 (Beta). It's got LZMA compression atlast! And it knocks the socks off all other options (--best/--force/--brute, etc).

Das mod

Das mod reviewed v2.03 on Nov 27, 2006

sweet prog.

The MAZZTer

The MAZZTer reviewed v2.03 on Nov 27, 2006

I use this tool to compress programs for use on my USB thumb drive. Works excellently! It can even compress linux binaries from within Windows!

--brute is fun to use to get those last few bytes out, but it usually doesn't give you a better size than --best, so that is my recommended option. If you run across a binary already compressed, you can -d it to decompress it and recompress it with --best to see if you can squeeze any more out of it. :)

VictorAnderson

VictorAnderson reviewed v2.03 on Nov 27, 2006

hey eblade - uhhh I don't think you're using the program properly because this thing does work.

I use it mostly to compress stuff for my pocketpc and it has made a HUGE difference in how many apps I can load into main memory on it - plus it runs a bit faster too.

eblade- what I do is copy the .exe I want to compress to a working folder - compress it - then overwrite the orginal with my compressed one. Obvisouly you're not ever removing the orginal, uncompressed file.

pluto2se

pluto2se reviewed v2.01 on Jun 21, 2006

ignore eblade's comment all together, it's not true, upx is great!

tereshchenko

tereshchenko reviewed v2.01 on Jun 20, 2006

eblade, you know nothing about computers, aren't you?

howe

howe reviewed v2.01 on Jun 20, 2006

eblade, you suck. What a moron.

eblade

eblade reviewed v2.00 on May 9, 2006

We may have a wee bit of a problem, in that this program appears to actually be a farce:

When you compress an exe, the new file is smaller, but your amount of free space is also decreased by the size of the new file. So, you're losing space instead of gaining space. Where is it putting the original file? That, I don't know. But, it would appear that this is similar to an old joke program that would reduce your files all to ridiculously small sizes, by making them a very small executeable that would then run them from a hidden location on your drive.

I don't see where it is actually doing this, so I may be incorrect, however, after running this on a bunch of programs, I noticed that when I started I had 1.8gb free, and now i have 1.0gb free.

melkor

melkor reviewed v2.00 on Apr 28, 2006

OMG they aren't dead after all. I've been watching this project slowly die for that last few years. Good to see they are finaly getting things together.

prm753

prm753 reviewed v2.00 on Apr 27, 2006

Excellent program. I use it to compress several items and they all still work perfectly after they have been compressed. If you are a developer of software I would highly recommend UPX to compress your programs.

eviljolly

eviljolly reviewed v2.00 on Apr 27, 2006

Highly effective EXE packer. Not only does it make your programs smaller, it makes them more difficult to crack.

shantanu

shantanu reviewed v2.00 on Apr 27, 2006

Woohoo...finally v2.0 is here! The best!!!

Das mod

Das mod reviewed v2.00 on Apr 27, 2006

no bad ....

korpse

korpse reviewed v2.00 on Apr 27, 2006

I definetly have to say that this is one of the best programs of all time. Good work!

hparra

hparra reviewed v2.00 on Apr 27, 2006

My all-time favourite: fast, effective and free! Other coders should learn from UPX instead of releasing bloated commercial packers/encryptor which are way behind of this small treasure.
Don't miss it, you won't regret it!

Ashis

Ashis reviewed v1.93 Beta on Sep 29, 2005

Wow....
Never expected!

Hmm....Great Tool.
I expect it to be popular in future if it comes out with a GUI.

BlackDex

BlackDex reviewed v1.93 Beta on Jul 21, 2005

There is an Shell for it.. Not from UPX it self.
But it has all the features and more :).

http://fileforum.betanew...l/UPXShell/1112274943/1

sync

sync reviewed v1.93 Beta on Apr 18, 2005

Awesome technology!

jaelanicu

jaelanicu reviewed v1.93 Beta on Apr 8, 2005

Great! Very small compressed size.
I would rate it 5+ if they make their own shell or GUI.

negate101

negate101 reviewed v1.93 Beta on Mar 23, 2005

UPX is nice, though I am a PECompact user. UPX is a great tool, but the decompression feature is something I would prefer not be available. I understand why it is there though.

ecjs

ecjs reviewed v1.93 Beta on Mar 2, 2005

It is awesome !

http://upx.sourceforge.net/#download

Just drag the .exe to compress to upx.exe and it does the work !

© 1998-2024 BetaNews, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.