File Details |
|
File Size | 52.6 MB |
---|---|
License | Freeware |
Operating System | Windows 7/8/10/Vista/XP |
Date Added | September 22, 2016 |
Total Downloads | 218,946 |
Publisher | Symantec Corp. |
Homepage | Norton AntiVirus Definitions |
Publisher's Description
As new threats emerge, Symantec immediately builds new protection updates and makes them available for download.
Latest Reviews
mikebray reviewed v04/26/2011 on Mar 12, 2014
top notch!
paulperry reviewed v04/26/2011 on Aug 24, 2013
5 stars obviously
kerimachin reviewed v04/26/2011 on Jul 22, 2013
essential. obviously.
sheinaya reviewed v04/26/2011 on Jul 21, 2012
try ca anti virus, for me its the best, real time scanner is very light, unlike other anti-virus makes your PC stuck at 5-10secs.
I have a copy, license will expire on 2015,
you can download it here>> ca-anti-virus dot weebly dot com.
kronos1962 reviewed v06/22/10 on Sep 5, 2010
Jeff why would anyone use a 2003 version? Besides from 2009 Norton re-wrote the entire program.
Jeff_56 reviewed v06/22/10 on Jun 24, 2010
For around 6 weeks, the 2003 versions - and some others don't work anymore after an update of the virus definitions. No support from Symantec and, naturally no fix.
Just look at their forum
http://community.norton....rror/td-p/230756/page/8
CyberDoc999 reviewed v11/11/09 on Nov 13, 2009
Bloated slow
uberfly reviewed v6/18/09 on Jun 19, 2009
Why are antivirus definitions even on Fileforum?
some guy reviewed v4/1/09 on Apr 3, 2009
bloat resource hog. poor detection rate. Avira or nod32 or kaspersky are your 3 best bests I prefer Avira over all just my 2 cents
Letterman reviewed v12/1/08 on Dec 1, 2008
First try 2009 then comment, otherwise you're spamer. 2009 symantec product are real revolution.
Much faster, much flexible [2]
mikebray reviewed v04/26/2011 on Mar 12, 2014
top notch!
paulperry reviewed v04/26/2011 on Aug 24, 2013
5 stars obviously
kerimachin reviewed v04/26/2011 on Jul 22, 2013
essential. obviously.
sheinaya reviewed v04/26/2011 on Jul 21, 2012
try ca anti virus, for me its the best, real time scanner is very light, unlike other anti-virus makes your PC stuck at 5-10secs.
I have a copy, license will expire on 2015,
you can download it here>> ca-anti-virus dot weebly dot com.
kronos1962 reviewed v06/22/10 on Sep 5, 2010
Jeff why would anyone use a 2003 version? Besides from 2009 Norton re-wrote the entire program.
Jeff_56 reviewed v06/22/10 on Jun 24, 2010
For around 6 weeks, the 2003 versions - and some others don't work anymore after an update of the virus definitions. No support from Symantec and, naturally no fix.
Just look at their forum
http://community.norton....rror/td-p/230756/page/8
CyberDoc999 reviewed v11/11/09 on Nov 13, 2009
Bloated slow
uberfly reviewed v6/18/09 on Jun 19, 2009
Why are antivirus definitions even on Fileforum?
some guy reviewed v4/1/09 on Apr 3, 2009
bloat resource hog. poor detection rate. Avira or nod32 or kaspersky are your 3 best bests I prefer Avira over all just my 2 cents
Letterman reviewed v12/1/08 on Dec 1, 2008
First try 2009 then comment, otherwise you're spamer. 2009 symantec product are real revolution.
Much faster, much flexible [2]
laptopy.net reviewed v10/1/08 on Oct 7, 2008
"loated performance sucking garbage. "
First try 2009 then comment, otherwise you're spamer. 2009 symantec product are real revolution.
Much faster, much flexible
gawd21 reviewed v4/15/08 on Apr 15, 2008
Far too many viruses get past Norton to make this worthless!
roj reviewed v4/13/08 on Apr 14, 2008
Not with YOUR money.
Both Symantec and McAfee build bloated performance sucking garbage. I have a LOT of experience with the corporate version of this app (SAV 8 / 9 / 10) and know that of which I speak.
ONE star.