Not bad.
Not good either lol.
1. CSS support is still just absurd. Why have a IE standard considering more and more people's been using Firefox, and a lot more sites are optimized for Firefox? (Although a LOT of Japanese sites here I've seen...
Read full review
it's fairly okay...
I mean I find it a bit lighter than the MSN Live one, which takes up considerable amount of memory on my computer.
But still, I'm impressed that aburton261 ran this thing on a 1.4mhz computer... just amazing.
Read full review
I'm curious. how much RAM does winamp cost on you guys' systems ?
It takes up 4Mb on my computer minimized, and 6Mb when in modern skin mode. I just wonder how much does it take on you guys' computers. I use foobar sometimes because it's really...
Read full review
It has gone a lot better than the last time I checked it. The HTML/Scripts support is a lot better than I expected. Although I DO like to give it a 5, the rendering is not fast enough (Normal page rendering is similar with Internet Explorer, of...
Read full review
as a beta, i rate it as 4 because it is easy to configure, and no need for tweaking. but the bad part is that it's slower than internet explorer (when loading up big pages, there is a VERY OBVIOUS difference) and other than tables (which Internet...
Read full review
